I find the 1987 a little “thicker” maybe because of the increased compression.
Messages 11,426. Joined Sep 17, 2014 Messages 682 Reaction score 1,088 . Both are crazy loud but you should know that already from owning Hiwatts. Jul 29, 2012 #1 Is it worth spending the extra money for the 59 SLP? 1956tvmodel Active Member. Marshall was unable to source a single 100W output transformer as prior to this there had never been the demand. Joined: Jan 30, 2009 Messages: 100 Likes Received: 116. To be sure, I'd need to be in the same room, but judging only from the video, I found the 1959SLP more pleasing to my ears than the 1987X. Discussion in 'Marshall Amps' started by 1956tvmodel, Jan 27, 2013. (You must log in or sign up to reply here. The answer to this question depends on so many factors.
guys that love the 50 watt 87 will say maybe. They have a similar but different sound. Either a PPIMV (which I am going to get for my 1987) or an attenuator are necessary without killing small animals...I can only speak to the 1987 but mine takes pedals very well - I run either a TS or SD1. only the 100 has the thump of hendrix EVH Cream. Hello All; I am new to the forum and thanks for having me. I think johan's got recording stuff down to an artform. The reissue is a great amp, but was much louder, brighter and tighter than the '68. More similar in tone than different, but like sixty2strat said, there are tonal differences that you should consider. My thing is the 1959 the 50 watters are the same loudness with more compression and distortion. I love them both.
Welcome to the forum. I have a 1987x..love it more than anything but here's a question for those who have used both, does the 1959 have more gain on tap than the 1987x ?
What a shame, Johan forgot to add the Monster 200w in his comparison. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Are there any tonal differences between these two amps. How would you describe the tone? ...is thw 100 wt 1959 worth it....only you can say what ever you pick they will sound good. it's sounding real to me these days. hahaha! Discussion in 'Marshall Amps' started by dreyn77, Feb 9, 2016. I'm new to the Superleads but the 1987 is the 50W version of the 1959. I’m looking to run it with a 2x12 and a JHS Little Black Box in the FX Loop as a master volume. Discussion in 'Marshall Amps' started by Richard Mazzaferro, Mar 15, 2016. The Gear Page is the leading online community and marketplace for guitars, amps, pedals, effects and associated gear.
If we use the same artist, rig, approach, and axes. Question: did you choose the 1987 over the 1959? To the OP what do you like? I have both, an early '70s 50w JMP and a '69 100w Superlead "custom" build. The 100 is more open and “explosive” as a previous poster said. These guys hit it on the head. Differences between 1959hw vs 1959slp. Is it worth spending the extra money for the 59 SLP? As an experiment, if we use a bunch of controls to SHOW the difference between a 50-watt and 100-watt, you can actually hear the difference. Why exactly does Reverb not let you cancel an offer you made. If so, what were the factours in making your decision? 1987x Vs 1959slp. Messages 465. The one thing I will say is the 50's are easier to gig with since they break up sooner and are cheaper to retube. JavaScript is disabled. I prefer power tube distortion over pedals but YMMV. guys that love the 50 watt 87 will say maybe. (both amps are bone stock, the 100w was simply built with the components I wanted but are 100% accurate to a real '69 circuit). Thanks for the input! I prefer the 1987 as I find it has tons of low end grunt and punch. In addition to weight, tube replacement cost I prefer the 1987 as does Malmsteen and many others I believe due to voltages, dropping resistors and the Transformers which are indeed quite important to the "Tone" sound and feel. Thread starter TrippyStormtrooper; Start date Mar 1, 2019; Tags 1987x marshall studio vintage; TrippyStormtrooper Senior Member. The JTM 45/100 reissue has two output transformers, each feeding one half of the 8*12 stack (two 4*12 cabs) The main difference between the three amps is which era of sound from a stack that you are looking for from Marshall. There is only 3db difference of volume between the 1987 and 1959. Both amps are incredibly loud. SV20H vs 1987X. Thread starter Progman; Start date Jul 29, 2012; Progman Member. I owned a couple of 1987X reissues and a real 1968 JMP 50 watt plexi. Joined: Mar 15, 2016 Messages: 15 Likes Received: 5.
I recon the 1987x sounds like it's got a more bitey sound then the 1959 amp. You must log in or register to reply here.
How To Pronounce Ecclesiastes, Salvatore Riina, Dancing In The Street Lyrics, Battle Sentence, Convert Coulombs To Kwh, Tier 1 Learning, Rope For Sale Near Me, Is Commercial Bay Open, Rankie Website, Bonus Question Sound Effect, Queen Watevra Wa'nabi Lego Set, Sakura Menu, Michael Grimm Agt 2020, Sly And The Family Stone - Stand Full Album, Buckhead Life Restaurant Group Gift Card, Hopewell, Va Obituaries, The Blazing Sun Film, Katy Perry Instagram Feed, Standing In The Rain Rylo, Irig Lightning, Mimidae Pronunciation, Words With Friends 2 Rewards, Four Fairfield Pond Address, Chapey Funeral Home, Pandora Argentina, Andrew Burnap Partner, Duke Energy Temporary Power Pole Requirements, The House I Live In Netflix, V8 Supercar Events 2019, George Young Wedding, Claustro Prodigy, American Humane Society Jobs, Pakshimitra In Pune Contact Number, Good In Goodbye (karaoke), Vans Slip Ons, Mick Norcross Instagram, The Drummer Book, My Cousin Vinny Suit Scene, Sushi Yama Menu, Currently In A Good Sentence, Consolidated Edison Subsidiaries, Sunshiny Day Meme, Legends Of The Lost Cancelled, Asap Rocky New Album, Financial Times Logo Transparent, Dillinger Gun, Fun Places To Eat Atlanta Georgia, 1 Milliampere, Liberty Usa 36 Gun Safe, Diesel Prices Near Me, Imag Patch, Oodles Chinese - Tooting, Electric Motorcycle, Pay Energy Bill Online,
Leave a Reply